Feedback on the movie journals

Dear students,
 
I finished reading your movie journals and put them with some feedback on my office door in an envelope (there is so much that I could not read them on the monitor). I am sorry for being late with this feedback, there is too much on my plate. As I am late with the feedback, feel free to submit  your third review on “Earth 2100″ by Sunday 8 PM. (Some of you already submitted it; if you wish, you are welcome to edit and re-submit.) 
 
Let me offer some general feedback: most of the journals are informative and of good quality. Most of you cover the major substantive issues and touch upon the aesthetic/professional qualities of the documentaries. Please note, however, that there is no need to repeat what’s in the movie, even to summarize the contents. I also watched the movie, and we also discuss it in class. Even when you write a movie review for a newpaper, there is no need for a thorough summary; your audience or editor wouldn’t want that.

Rather, your independent analysis of the frames, sourcing and professional techniques should be highlighted. It should be your analytical and personal text, not the recycling of the content of the movie.

Feel free to share your independent thoughts, arguments, even critical remarks. Also, feel free to use first person, and express feelings in these essays. As we discussed earlier, the journals have three goals:

a) introduce key environmental problems and challenges of the 21st century;

b) offer an overview of some of the best, most important, and most infliential, documentaries and television programs in the field (hopefully, they are also among the most enjoyable);

c) offer a training ground for refining your personal essay style, your voice and genre.

The third goal would be best used by developing your independent, analytical insights and critical points.

A specific question should always be explored: does the movie offer solutions to the problem? If yes, what kind of individual or collective solutions are these? How detailed are the solutions and how much emphasis is put on/time is given to them in the movie? What is the proportion of introducing the problems vs. offering solutions? Are those two presented as being separate, or interconnected, intervowen in some way? What is your opinion about the presentation of solutions? Are they effectively presented?

A technical note. Please always include your name at the top of the journal. Also, please name your word file in this way FAMILYNAME3 for movie journal 3, FAMILYNAME4 for movie journal 4, etc. (for easier documentation). In the Subject of the email, plase write Moviejournal 4 TITLE OF MOVIE. If possible, please also use an email address that can be identified with your name (preferebly, family and first name). 

I hope you enjoy the films, the guest speakers and the exercises.Thank you for the good work–please keep it up.

Best, Miklos

Week 4: movie journal 3 about Earth 2100, reading, and assignments

Dear students,

as we discussed in class, we will do four things in class in Week 4.

1. We will discuss the social impact evaluation of “The End of the LIne”, so please finish reading it if you still have not done so: http://britdoc.org/real_good/evaluation

On the basis of this impact assessment, please make suggestions on how to build an analytical framework for the analysis of the many types of social impact of ANY environmental documentary, and how to build successful environmental campaigns around such documentaries..

2. We will discuss the television series ”Earth 2100″. Please write your movie journal 3 about “Earth 2100”. Please also look at the program’s website at http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Earth2100/ and evaluate it briefly in your journal. The journal has 3 goals: a) introduce key environmental issues of the 21st century; b) offer a review of the best documentaries and television programs in the field; c) offer a training ground for refining your personal essay style  (voice and genre). The journal  may be personal, and the length is between 1-2 pages (single space) by popular demand. Please remember to include your name at top of page 1 of every journal and send it to environmentalcommunication2012@gmail.com. I will be able to give you feedback on the first two movie journals by Tuesday. Feel free to send the journal till Thursday morning before the class. 

3. Please formulate your preferences (1-3) for the final paper: which documentary you’d like to choose for investigating its social impacts and (lack of) campaign around the movie?

4. From 11 AM, we will discuss the planned HKU green newsletter with Ann Kildahl  and Joy Lam of the HKU Sustanability Office (SO). Please remember to look at green newsletters at universities and NGOs in your home country, and propose formats, genres, communication strategies (regarding the SO website, Facebook page, events, posters), etc.

Please see detailed guidelines about the green newsletter as well as the movie journals in earlier posts.

Best regards,

Miklos

HKU’s “green newsletter”: experiential learning in Week 4

Dear students,

as we discussed in class, HKU’s Sustanability Manager Ann Kildahl asked our class to help with ideas and suggestions the launch of the “green newsletter” of the HKU Sustainability Office (SO). I think this presents a good opportunity for experiential learning in the area of environmental communication. We will have a brainstorming session  with Ann and her colleague Joy Lam in the second part of our class next Thursday (Sep 27) from 11 AM.

As discussed in class, please search for and review some existing newsletters published by universities and NGOs in your homr country and top global universities, and bring to class your suggestions and “best practices”.

Here is some food for thought: what is your vision, what would be the purpose of this newsletter? Who should be the target audience? How often would you suggest to send it out? (The SO will have funding for a part time editor.) Should it be published online only, or also in print? How should it relate to the SO website and Facebook page?

Please make suggestions in your dual capacity as journalists/communication experts and HKU students.

Best,
Miklos

Environmental documentaries

Dear students,
please find the links to the trailers, Internet Movie Database entries, and Rotten Tomato databases of the 15 documentaries that were mentioned in class. As we discussed, please select your preferences (three preferences) for case studies for social impact analysis in the class project. You will also write movies journals about the first 12 environmental documentaries and we will also discuss these in class. 
Best regards,
Miklos
 
 
The Lightbulb Conspiracy (2010)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=251qoGOqpdk
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1825163/
The movie is not found on Rotten Tomatoes.
 
Earth 2100 (2009)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pcZuSDq2SE
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1471346/
This is not found in Rotten Tomatoes probably because it is television series, not a movie.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Jamie’s School Dinners (2005)
Link to the ad of this TV series: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9DAYNKDixw
In this Youtube channel, there are five episodes. Episode 5 is entitled
“Jamie’s Return to School Dinners”. It was aired in 2006. The plot is
sort of a sequel of Jamie’s school dinner campaign.
http://www.youtube.com/user/SteveChez4life/videos?query=Jamie%27s)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0464070/
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jamies-return-to-school-dinners/

Reading for week 3, and movie journal 2

Dear students,

as we discussed in class, please read the social impact evaluation of “The End of the LIne”: http://britdoc.org/real_good/evaluation

Please prepare suggestions on how to build an analytical framework for the analysis of the many types of social impact of ANY environmental documentary, and how to build successful environmental campaigns around such documentaries..

Also, as discussed, please write your movie journal 2 about “The Light Bulb Conspiracy”. Your ideas may be discussed with the director on Thursday. The journal may be personal, and the length is up to 2 pages (single space) by popular demand. I am doing my best to send you feedback on the first movie journal (I am at a conference abroad until Tueasday). I can give you feedback on Tuesday latest; feel free to send the journal till Thursday morning before the class. 

Best regards,

Miklos

Cosima Dannoritzer will be our guest speaker on Sep 20 (Thursday) 11:00-12:25

Dear students,

next Thursday (Sept 20) in the second part of our Environmental Communication class, we will have Cosima Dannoritzer, a German television producer and documentary film director, as guest speaker. She directed the great business history and environmental documentary “The Light Bulb Conspiracy”, and several other films. Please see the film’s trailer here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=251qoGOqpdk

Most of you already saw her film at the screening last week. Those who have not seen it yet, please watch it online (it is available on the net).

This week (September 13), in the first part of our class 9:30-10:50, I will give a presentation about “the environmental performance of the media”.

In the second part of the class, we will discuss Brown’s review of environmental problems of the 21st century (“Challenges of the New Century”. In: State of the World 2000: A Worldwatch Institute Report) and Global Trends 2015: A Transformed World.

We will also discuss the documentary about overfishing, “The End of the Line”, and your experiences in writing the first film journal.

Thank you. Best,

Miklos

Film journal 1: The End of the Line (2009)

Film journal 1: The End of the Line (2009)

As we discussed it in class, please watch the environmental documentary about overfishing, The End of the Line (2009) and write a brief movie journal. You may use the framework (or some of its elements) below.

Environmental issues, frames, and action

  • How does this film relate to the environment? What are the issues it covers? How are these issues interrelated?
  • What frames or concepts does the film use or imply regarding the environment? Be specific abut the frames used by the scientist sources and other economic, political, cultural, national, international legal, justice, or other frames.
  • Is there any scientific evidence (data, sources) or concepts presented in the movies?
  • Is politics involved in the films in any way?
  • Are the issues important, why should we care?
  • Does this film tell viewers and other stakeholders what they can do regarding sustainability?
  • Does these film advocate individual or collective/systemic solutions?

Aesthetic and professional value

  • Explain the genre of the film. How are protagonists, interviews with scientists, documentary footage, investigation, and other approaches used?
  • What do you think about directing, acting, camera work, cuts/editing, music?
  • What is the artistic/aesthetic value of this film?

Conclusions

  • In your view, is this a good film? Why; or why not?
  • Could this film be used in environmental awareness-raising? If yes, how?
  • Any critical or other points?
  • Explain your evaluation criteria, and give a grade (between A and F) to this movie.

Format and submission of movie journal

Please write a ca. 1 page long movie journal addressing some of the questions above. (Use single space, 12 letter size, in a Word document.) Please do not copy the questions to the review.

Please send your journal to me at the environmentalcommunication2012@gmail.com address. I created this email address as a mailbox for assignment submission.

Submission deadline: Wednesday, September 12, 4:00 PM, 2012.

I put the film on reserve for you in the Library (first floor, AV collection), so you may watch it there. I had a great experience watching the movie in the library: there are great, sharp underwater images, and the earphones give perfect sound quality.

Have a good weekend and enjoy the film!

Best,

Miklos  

Readings for Week 2

2. Environmental problems in the 21st century

What are the most pressing environmental problems today? The portrayal of environmental issues in the media: global warming, soil, water and air pollution, the mass extinction of species, water scarcity, overfishing. How can the media shape perceptions, public opinion and impact government policy on the environment? The changing issues in environmental journalism and the visibility of environmental problems in the media. How can different environmental problems be represented in the media? Communication principles in the coverage of environmental issues: media framing, agenda setting, campaigns, newsworthiness, news construction, and media events. How can journalists use scientific evidence; risk analysis; and emotional framing? And how can they show what audiences can DO?

Readings:

Brown, Lester R. 2000. Challenges of the New Century. In: State of the World 2000: A Worldwatch Institute Report.New York: W. W. Norton and Company, pp. 3-21. 1. State of the World 21st Century

Chapter 4 “Scarcity in the Mids of Plenty”) in Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World

http://www.aicpa.org/research/cpahorizons2025/globalforces/downloadabledocuments/globaltrends.pdf

Executive summary of the whole report:

http://www.acus.org/publication/global-trends-2025-transformed-world

Recommended readings: Chapters 2 (“Demographics of Discord”), 3 (“The New Players”), and 4 “Scarcity in the Mids of Plenty”) in Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World

Question for discussion:

“Was Brown right?” In 2000, Lester Brown made forecasts for the 21st century about the most critical environmental issues. What can we say more than a decade later—were his forecasts right? Or perhaps the situation is better or worse than he forecasted?

Screening of “The Light Bulb Conspiracy” + meet the director today at 7:30 PM

Dear students,
 
I hope you liked our first class this morning, including the talk by Ann Kildahl.
  
Regarding the premiere screening of “The Light Bulb Conspiracy”, I will leave from Eliot Hall (JMSC main entrance) around 6:35 PM. If you’d like to join, you are most welcome to meet there and we can go together. Or, alternatively, we can meet at the screening in the Hong Arts Centre in Wanchai.
 
Please let me know if you have any questions.
 
See you soon. Best regards,
 
Miklos