Here is a detailed description of what is expected from your final projects and the evalulation criteria. (REVISED 11:30am HKT April 20th)
1. JOURNALISTIC MERIT: You are expected to do a work of original journalism, not a research paper. The core of your story must be based on content and information that you have obtained yourself through interviews, researching, photographing, recording, and/or videotaping. Your story must contribute some original information and insights into your subject that is not presently available online or elsewhere in other people’s work.
2. WORDS:
Text-centric stories: If you are doing a story that needs to be told primarily with written words: Around 1000 words original text is the ballpark size for one-person projects. But you are being evaluated on quality of content, not number of words. Also, note that something this long needs to be broken into sections or pages in order to be digestible online. Ideally no more than 3-400 words per page or section. (2-person projects would be around 2000 words but divided into more sections.)
Visual and multi-media centric stories: If your story relies heavily on visuals you may only have an introductory text of 300-400 words plus captions or quotes that go along with photo essays, audio, and/or video. (It’s pretty obvious when somebody has little text but has obviously put quality efforts into their audio or visual elements to tell a journalistic story – and when they are just throwing up audio clips and pictures to fill space in order to avoid having to write.)
Your written words will be evaluated according to your ability to be concise and clear, so that the reader can clearly understand what your point is. You should demonstrate that you understand the guidelines for good writing on the web as outlined by Foust and McAdams. Show that you know how to make use of bullet points, headings, and lists where appropriate.
3. VISUALS:
For text-centric stories: Even if text is the main medium for telling your story, you need at least 3 pictures or visual elements of some kind: visuals that clearly enhance your reader’s understanding of your story, and will help attract people to actually read your story.
For visual and multimedia-centric stories: The number of pictures or audio or video elements, or size of photo gallery will depend somewhat on the subject and how you are combining text with the other elements. However, your use of all pictures, audio or graphics will be evaluated in terms of how the choice and use of these particular elements enhance the audience’s understanding and experience of the story. Not just elements for the sake of elements.
4. LINKING: You should include relevant hyperlinks: to relevant resources, other articles on the subject, or blogs. Link the names of places and people, or key phrases in your text when you think those links will provide a service to your readers in helping them to learn more about the subject. Depending on the subject, you may have a special page devoted to resource links, or you may have a page quoting from blogs or forums concerned with your story subject, and linking to them, with pictures of the bloggers or screen grabs from their sites.
5. INTERACTIVITY: When relevant and when it enhances the story, your work should make use of interactivity such as comments and polls or other invitations for user feedback. Stories that deal with subjects that are discussed extensively online should link to and try to engage with those online conversations.
6. QUALITY, NOT QUANTITY: Your goal is to produce a piece of journalism that people who don’t know you would actually take the time to read, look at, and listen to. Your classmate-editors will give you feedback on whether the elements of your draft seem like they fit that criteria or not. That’s why it’s important to be concise and not be too long or throw in too many elements that nobody is going to listen to or watch. More is not necessarily better. Less is often more.